CEDET

Hi,

>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Recursive `require'
>> for feature `semantic-ede-grammar'")
> 
>   The end of the file is:
> 
>     ;;;###autoload
>     (eval-after-load "ede-proj"
>         (quote
>          (require 'semantic-ede-grammar)
>          ))
> 
>     (ede-proj-register-target "semantic grammar"
>                               semantic-ede-proj-target-grammar)
> 
>     (provide 'semantic-ede-grammar)
> 
>   So if 'ede-proj' is already loaded, this will result in a (direct)
> recursive dependency.  If I remember well, it is exactly the same bug
> as encountered a few weeks ago (with an other CEDET file).

You're probably right.  So, I committed a similar (untested) fix ;-)

Thanks!
David

I did some more work for on the unit tests for other modes.

I have some problems though:

- when I debug I get an error in an IELM buffer:
ELISP> (semantic-fetch-tags)
*** Eval error ***  Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
if I change the buffer to be parsed. (I do this 1st: (set-buffer
(get-file-buffer "/tmp/javascripttest.js")))

- I need to improve the validator function to handle trees, or I cant
  handle java classes. This would extend to other cases like javascript:

 function fun1(a, b){
    return a;
  }

function fun2(a, b){ //1
    return b;
  }

  would yield this tree:

  (("fun1" function
  (:arguments
   (("a" variable nil
     (reparse-symbol FormalParameterList)
     #<overlay from 16 to 17 in javascripttest.js>)
    ("b" variable nil
     (reparse-symbol FormalParameterList)
     #<overlay from 19 to 20 in javascripttest.js>)))
  nil #<overlay from 2 to 40 in javascripttest.js>)
 ("fun2" function
  (:arguments
   (("a" variable nil
     (reparse-symbol FormalParameterList)
     #<overlay from 56 to 57 in javascripttest.js>)
    ("b" variable nil
     (reparse-symbol FormalParameterList)
     #<overlay from 59 to 60 in javascripttest.js>)))
  nil #<overlay from 42 to 84 in javascripttest.js>))

My question, then, is if, I make a validator tree like this:

  (("fun1" function
  (:arguments
   (("a" variable nil
     (reparse-symbol FormalParameterList)
     (overlay 16  17  "javascripttest.js"))
    ("b" variable nil
     (reparse-symbol FormalParameterList)
     (overlay 19  20  "javascripttest.js"))))
  nil (overlay 2 40  "javascripttest.js"))
 ("fun2" function
  (:arguments
   (("a" variable nil
     (reparse-symbol FormalParameterList)
     (overlay 56  57  "javascripttest.js"))
    ("b" variable nil
     (reparse-symbol FormalParameterList)
     (overlay 59  60  "javascripttest.js")))
  nil (overlay 42  84  "javascripttest.js"))

if this tree will always be generated the same way by
(semantic-fetch-tags) ?

(overlay ...) is of course a special symbol I need to implement for
the validator, and the next question is:

- can this be done more cleverly?





joakim@... writes:

> Eric,
>
> I refactored your unit test code a bit and added a python test.
>
> I just want to run it by you first to see that I'm on the right track,
> then I can add tests for java and javascript, at least. They would be
> very similar to the Python test.
>
> /Joakim
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Joakim Verona
> http://www.verona.se
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Cedet-devel mailing list
> Cedet-devel@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cedet-devel

-- 
Joakim Verona
http://www.verona.se