Hmmm, that's not quite the usage I had in mind. I think I'll define my
own test operation then.
Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> smishra@... writes:
>>I've written a little test suite, and I was going to write a little
>>ASDF integration for the suite. Just as I was about to define an
>>asdf::test-op for the suite, I found that there's already one
>>there... Only it's implementation isn't. Would there be any objection
>>to me hijacking this test-op? Or would that be unwise and generally
> I think the idea is that one defines
> (defmethod asdf:perform
> ((o asdf:test-op) (s (eql (find-system :<your-system>))))
> ... in other words, that's what it's there for.