Bacula

Hello,

Most likely you edited the .conf file and modified the
FileSet.  If that is the case, listing all the FileSets recorded
in the database will show multiple copies of the FileSet
record with different hashes.

In most cases, other than changing the FileSet, Bacula
clearly indicates why it is upgrading a level.  In the case
of a FileSet change, it prints a notice saying something
like a valid Full could not be found.

The probability that there is a new bug introduced between
5.2.1 and 5.2.2 is probably about 0.0001% since there were very
few coding changes except for bug fixes.

Regards,
Kern

On 11/30/2011 07:55 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote:
>
> FYI
>
> Not sure if anyone's seen or reported this, but I upgraded from 5.2.1 to
> 5.2.2 yesterday and during my backups last night, several jobs were
> promoted from Incremental to Full, even though their job configurations
> had not changed and they did have a valid Full backup from last week.
>
> I have never seen this happen before with bacula in general or my
> configuration in particular, so I thought it might be possible that a
> bug was introduced into 5.2.2.
>
> thanks,
> Stephen

On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:26:54 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is to announce that Bacula version 5.2.2 has been released to 
> Source
> Forge as well as especially for our Cuban friends who are locked out
> of Source Forge:  http://www.bacula.org/downloads/Bacula-5.2.2.

Hi Kern,

can you please place a tag 'Release-5.2.2' into git repo? Some strange 
package maintainers (like me:) are trying to pack git repo directly.

Hello Vitaly,

Yes, sorry.  We always have a tag, but sometimes I forget for
a while to push it to the bacula.org repo.   It is there now.

Best regards,
Kern

On 11/28/2011 02:39 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 12:26:54 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is to announce that Bacula version 5.2.2 has been released to
>> Source
>> Forge as well as especially for our Cuban friends who are locked out
>> of Source Forge:  http://www.bacula.org/downloads/Bacula-5.2.2.
> Hi Kern,
>
> can you please place a tag 'Release-5.2.2' into git repo? Some strange
> package maintainers (like me:) are trying to pack git repo directly.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-devel mailing list
> Bacula-devel@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:03:11 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Vitaly,
>
> Yes, sorry.  We always have a tag, but sometimes I forget for
> a while to push it to the bacula.org repo.   It is there now.
>

Thanks!

Please either upgrade to version 5.2.2 where this problem
is fixed, or read the New Features chapter of the manual,
where it is explained how the catalog backend works and
how to setup a library.  This information is also in the
ReleaseNotes.

On 11/27/2011 11:23 PM, Christian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> trying to update MY current 2.4.4 RPM to 5.2.1 and running into a wired
> problem with this new lib stuff.
>
> all these new libs are packed by my "default" package "bacula" which is
> providing:
> Provides: bpipe-fd.so()(64bit) libbac-5.2.1.so()(64bit)
> libbaccats-mysql-5.2.1.so()(64bit) libbaccfg-5.2.1.so()(64bit)
> libbacfind-5.2.1.so()(64bit) libbacpy-5.2.1.so()(64bit) libbac
> sql-5.2.1.so()(64bit)
>
> as you can see there is no "libbaccats-5.2.1.so()(64bit)
>
> when I try to install my "bacula-server" (dir and sd) I get:
> ra-intra:~ # rpm -Uvh bacula-server-5.2.1-1.x86_64.rpm
> bacula-5.2.1-1.x86_64.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
>           libbaccats-5.2.1.so()(64bit) is needed by
> bacula-server-5.2.1-1.x86_64
>
> thats right cause there is no package that provides this lib. And this
> is correct cause it is a sysmlink:
>
> ra-intra:/usr/lib64 # l libbac*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 418097 27. Nov 22:36 libbac-5.2.1.so*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     25 27. Nov 23:08 libbaccats-5.2.1.so ->
> libbaccats-mysql-5.2.1.so*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    928 27. Nov 22:36 libbaccats.la
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  33974 27. Nov 22:36 libbaccats-mysql-5.2.1.so*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   1076 27. Nov 22:36 libbaccats-mysql.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     25 27. Nov 23:08 libbaccats-mysql.so ->
> libbaccats-mysql-5.2.1.so*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     19 27. Nov 23:08 libbaccats.so ->
> libbaccats-5.2.1.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  43107 27. Nov 22:36 libbaccfg-5.2.1.so*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    952 27. Nov 22:36 libbaccfg.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     18 27. Nov 23:08 libbaccfg.so ->
> libbaccfg-5.2.1.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  64907 27. Nov 22:36 libbacfind-5.2.1.so*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    928 27. Nov 22:36 libbacfind.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     19 27. Nov 23:08 libbacfind.so ->
> libbacfind-5.2.1.so*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    945 27. Nov 22:36 libbac.la
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   7716 27. Nov 22:36 libbacpy-5.2.1.so*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    946 27. Nov 22:36 libbacpy.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     17 27. Nov 23:08 libbacpy.so ->
> libbacpy-5.2.1.so*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     15 27. Nov 23:08 libbac.so ->  libbac-5.2.1.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 178087 27. Nov 22:36 libbacsql-5.2.1.so*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    922 27. Nov 22:36 libbacsql.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     18 27. Nov 23:08 libbacsql.so ->
> libbacsql-5.2.1.so*
>
> so why does bacula-server:
> Provides: bacula-dir bacula-sd
> Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh /usr/bin/env libbac-5.2.1.so()(64bit)
> libbaccats-5.2.1.so()(64bit) ..... ?
>
> When I dig into the source dirs (src/cats/.libs), I can find the lib
> "libbaccats-5.2.1.so"
> lape:/usr/src/packages/BUILD/bacula-5.2.1/src/cats/.libs>  file
> libbaccats-5.2.1.so
> libbaccats-5.2.1.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1
> (SYSV), dynamically linked, not stripped
>
> why is it replaced with  link to libbaccats-[DB_TYPE]-[VERSION].so ?
> with is the "install-default-backend" script ?
>
> How can I fix this packaging problem ?
> For me this looks very weird, especially when I compare the "bacula-way"
> with e.g. proftpd, postfix, .....-way.
>
> Thanks and
> Cheers
>

>>>>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:49:54 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
> 
> This is to let you know that Bacula version 5.2.2 is a major bug fix 
> release to
> version 5.2.1, and it in the public git repo ready for release.

It compiles and passes a minimal test on FreeBSD 8 (thanks for merging the
fixes for --disable-libtool).

__Martin

On 11/25/2011 01:59 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:49:54 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
>> This is to let you know that Bacula version 5.2.2 is a major bug fix
>> release to
>> version 5.2.1, and it in the public git repo ready for release.
> It compiles and passes a minimal test on FreeBSD 8 (thanks for merging the
> fixes for --disable-libtool).

Nice. Thanks for the testing and confirmation.

By the way, after the release of 5.2.2,
we (most of the developers) will spend a good amount of time trying to
fix/close as many of the bug reports as possible.  There are many more
than I would like to see.

Best regards,
Kern

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 02:32:45PM +0100, W. van den Akker wrote:
> I hope to adopt the package because it is orphaned in Debian.
> Perhaps I can also cherrypick from your source ;)

It's not. [0] But if you want to help, mail the team at
pkg-bacula-devel@...

Hauke

[0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bacula.html

-- 
 .''`.   Jan Hauke Rahm <jhr@...>               http://www.jhr-online.de
: :'  :  Debian Developer                                 http://www.debian.org
`. `'`   Member of the Linux Foundation                    http://www.linux.com
  `-     Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe      http://www.fsfe.org

On 23.11.2011 15:03, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 02:32:45PM +0100, W. van den Akker wrote:
>> I hope to adopt the package because it is orphaned in Debian.
>> Perhaps I can also cherrypick from your source ;)
>
> It's not. [0] But if you want to help, mail the team at
> pkg-bacula-devel@...
>
> Hauke
>
> [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bacula.html
>


... and I just discovered that Ubuntu already has a 5.2.1 package.


http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-bacula-devel@...>

- Thomas

El 23/11/11 15:03, Jan Hauke Rahm escribió:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 02:32:45PM +0100, W. van den Akker wrote:
>> I hope to adopt the package because it is orphaned in Debian.
>> Perhaps I can also cherrypick from your source ;)
> It's not. [0]
Not at all, indeed.
Only a bit delayed w.r.t. the official release (or so I hope ;) )

[0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bacula.html


Regards,

	J.L.

On 11/22/2011 08:08 PM, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 03:48 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> Philipp is active here and on -users
>>>
>>> If you've noticed some issues you should let him know. I've sent him a few reports
>>> and he's come back with fixes within a couple of days.
>>
>> Once I can sort out what is going on with the postgre packages I'll report back on them.
>>
>> I needed to do some quick testing with a mock setup so I thought I would setup an sqlite
>> install but the packages are broken:
>>
>> # yum install libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.1-9.1.x86_64
>> # rpm -ql libbaccats-sqlite3.x86_64
>> /usr/lib64/bacula/create_sqlite3_database
>> /usr/lib64/bacula/drop_sqlite3_database
>> /usr/lib64/bacula/drop_sqlite3_tables
>> /usr/lib64/bacula/grant_sqlite3_privileges
>> /usr/lib64/bacula/make_sqlite3_tables
>> /usr/lib64/bacula/update_sqlite3_tables
>> /usr/lib64/libbaccats-5.2.1.so
>> /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.1.so
>>
>> # yum install bacula-sqlite.x86_64
>> ...
>> Error: Package: bacula-sqlite-5.2.1-9.1.x86_64 (home_dassit_bacula)
>>            Requires: libbaccats-sqlite = 5.2.1
>>
>> jlc
>>
> 
> Thanks Joseph for the report, it seems that we got a trouble with the name and the require/provide.
> I will try to fix that tonight, and directly made a test.
> I'm pretty confident to the fact the other db libs have the same kind of trouble.
> 
> 

Joseph seems to be fixed actually

zypper in bacula-sqlite
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
Resolving package dependencies...

The following NEW packages are going to be installed:
  bacula-bconsole bacula-dir bacula-fd bacula-libs bacula-sd bacula-sqlite bacula-tools libbaccats-sqlite3 libbacsql-5_2_1

9 new packages to install.
Overall download size: 1,2 MiB. After the operation, additional 3,7 MiB will be used.
Continue? [y/n/?] (y): y
Retrieving package bacula-libs-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (1/9), 178,0 KiB (463,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: bacula-libs-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Retrieving package libbacsql-5_2_1-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (2/9), 191,0 KiB (545,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: libbacsql-5_2_1-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Retrieving package bacula-tools-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (3/9), 172,0 KiB (821,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: bacula-tools-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Retrieving package bacula-sd-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (4/9), 201,0 KiB (700,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: bacula-sd-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Retrieving package bacula-fd-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (5/9), 80,0 KiB (196,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: bacula-fd-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Retrieving package bacula-bconsole-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (6/9), 25,0 KiB (42,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: bacula-bconsole-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Retrieving package libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (7/9), 24,0 KiB (48,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Retrieving package bacula-dir-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (8/9), 314,0 KiB (935,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: bacula-dir-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Retrieving package bacula-sqlite-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64 (9/9), 11,0 KiB (1,0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: bacula-sqlite-5.2.1-149.1.x86_64.rpm [done]
Installing: bacula-libs-5.2.1-149.1 [done]
Installing: libbacsql-5_2_1-5.2.1-149.1 [done]
Installing: bacula-tools-5.2.1-149.1 [done]
Installing: bacula-sd-5.2.1-149.1 [done]
Additional rpm output:
replacing placeholder XXX_REPLACE_WITH_LOCAL_HOSTNAME_XXX in bacula-sd.conf with hostname 'bacula-test'


Installing: bacula-fd-5.2.1-149.1 [done]
Additional rpm output:
replacing placeholder XXX_REPLACE_WITH_LOCAL_HOSTNAME_XXX in bacula-fd.conf with hostname 'bacula-test'


Installing: bacula-bconsole-5.2.1-149.1 [done]
Installing: libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.1-149.1 [done]
Additional rpm output:
linking /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.1.so  to /usr/lib64/libbaccats-5.2.1.so
setting sqlite3 as default_db_type in /usr/lib64/bacula/grant_bacula_privileges
setting sqlite3 as default_db_type in /usr/lib64/bacula/create_bacula_database
setting sqlite3 as default_db_type in /usr/lib64/bacula/make_bacula_tables


Installing: bacula-dir-5.2.1-149.1 [done]
Additional rpm output:
replacing placeholder XXX_REPLACE_WITH_LOCAL_HOSTNAME_XXX in bacula-dir.conf with hostname 'bacula-test'


Installing: bacula-sqlite-5.2.1-149.1 [done]

Now Philipp is aware of it, and will (once he have the time to) republish the fix to the dassIT build.
Once again thanks for the report.


-- 

Bruno Friedmann
Ioda-Net Sàrl http://www.ioda-net.ch

openSUSE Member & Ambassador
GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227
irc: tigerfoot

Hi Bruno and everyone else,

Please keep in mind that I also submitted a systemd-related patch, though mine
was only for bacula-fd and added socket activation [1]. I’m not sure
if/where/when this has actually been merged, I don’t really get the bacula
development/branch model (but I don’t try to, either).

Bruno: Your service file for bacula-fd looks way heavier than mine, though,
maybe you can highlight and comment on the differences?

Best regards,
Michael

[1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=201105041029.p44AT9hN017672%40higson.cam.lispworks.com&forum_name=bacula-devel

On 11/22/2011 11:14 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hi Bruno and everyone else,
> 
> Please keep in mind that I also submitted a systemd-related patch, though mine
> was only for bacula-fd and added socket activation [1]. I’m not sure
> if/where/when this has actually been merged, I don’t really get the bacula
> development/branch model (but I don’t try to, either).
> 
> Bruno: Your service file for bacula-fd looks way heavier than mine, though,
> maybe you can highlight and comment on the differences?
> 
> Best regards,
> Michael
> 
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=201105041029.p44AT9hN017672%40higson.cam.lispworks.com&forum_name=bacula-devel

Michael, I didn't want to change any feature of bacula actually.
Usage about the socket activation could be cool, but I'm not 100% sure about it.
And need to be discussed/organized up & down stream.

What we prepare, is something non intrusive. just a drop in replacement for the init script.

For the field : people on systemd help me to review and get it right
+ man systemdXXXX


-- 

Bruno Friedmann
Ioda-Net Sàrl http://www.ioda-net.ch

openSUSE Member & Ambassador
GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227
irc: tigerfoot

On 11/22/2011 12:22 PM, W. van den Akker wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> No explicitly meaning Bacula-Web, but also the wx-console, traymonitor 
> et al.
> I saw the bacula.pot file in the .po directory and no Dutch one.
>
> Furthermore I try to adopt the Bacula package on Debian. Currently it is
> non-maintained and stuck on 5.0.3.
:-(
> Recently switched from Amanda to Bacula and find it a very good piece of
> software .
Nice.  It would be interesting to hear your Bacula pros/cons vs Amanda.

It would be best if you pull down the current source (5.2.1) from source
forge and work against it for the .po files.  Even better than pulling the
source from Sourceforge would be to checkout a git repo and use Branch-5.2,
then you will be on *the* most current code.

Regards,
Kern
>
> Greetings,
> Willem
>
> On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:39 +0100, Bacula-Dev wrote:
>> Hi Willem,
>>
>> I guess that you are talking about Bacula-Web dutch translation ?
>>
>> You're right, nobody is working on this language yet ;)
>> A new messages.po file is pretty much ready (a new version of 
>> Bacula-Web is coming by next few days).
>>
>> I'll inform all of you about this new translation file asap.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Davide
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, W. van den Akker <listsrv@... 
>> <mailto:listsrv@...>> wrote: 
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     I want to make a Dutch translation for Bacula.
>>     I didnt see any Dutch .po file so I guess there isn't one.
>>     Somebody working on it?
>>
>>     Can I send the .po to this devel list?
>>
>>     greetings,
>>     Willem
>>     -- 
>>     This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>     dangerous content by *MailScanner
>>     <http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and is
>>     believed to be clean. 
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
>>     contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
>>     security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
>>     data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
>>     http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Bacula-devel mailing list
>>     Bacula-devel@...
>>     <mailto:Bacula-devel@...>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, 
>> and is
>> believed to be clean.
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-devel mailing list
> Bacula-devel@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel