Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Server

ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
schreibt:
>As far as I can tell the messages score matched the lowerlimit, but
>it was
>marked as OK.  The lower limit is 45, and its score was 45.


MessageScoring Lower Limit (MessageScoringLowerLimit)
MessageScoring will tag messages with totalscore >>>>>>higher<<<<<<
than this limit

What modules?  Some are windows specific and as such will not compile in
linux.  Other than that, perl isn't platform dependant.  You can always try
compiling perl from scratch to see if that helps.

Did you do a "install bundle:CPAN" inside cpan to update it?  Also, you may
try exiting cpan then going back in and trying to install modules again that
fail.  I've noticed that sometimes that is necessary as more modules are
installed in a session, for whatever reason.

One last unrelated note.  You might consider going with a more stable linux
platform.  If you prefer redhat, CentOS, for all intensive purposes, is a
mirror of redhat's enterprise product.  Because of that it is very stable.
Fedora is more of redhat's development platform in that while it is
considered mostly stable, much of the enterprise product's changes are
implemented there first and then added into the enterprise product once any
bugs are worked out.

If you do choose CentOS, you'll need to compile and install version 5.10.x
of perl as it comes with 5.8.  You'll want to leave both on the system but
'disable' version 5.8 and prevent it from auto updating.  If you go that
route I have a quick how to I can shoot you.


Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdickson@...
301-600-2399/x12399



> From: Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:12:44 +0000
> To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Subject: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
> 
> I'm having problems installing the modules for V2 on a new installation of
> Fedora 12. Is there a recommended platform?
> Thanks
> Steve
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit?

Doesn't matter.


Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdickson@...
301-600-2399/x12399



> From: Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:05:26 +0000
> To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
> 
> Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Downloading now, your doc would be welcome...
Thanks
steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdickson@...] 
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:14 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....

Doesn't matter.


Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdickson@...
301-600-2399/x12399



> From: Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:05:26 +0000
> To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
> 
> Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

http://www.kirsle.net/doc/perl510.html




Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdickson@...
301-600-2399/x12399



> From: Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:20:47 +0000
> To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
> 
> Downloading now, your doc would be welcome...
> Thanks
> steve
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdickson@...]
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:14 PM
> To: ASSP development mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
> 
> Doesn't matter.
> 
> 
> Paul K. Dickson
> Systems Administrator
> Interagency Information Technologies
> Frederick County Government
> Frederick, MD 21701
> pdickson@...
> 301-600-2399/x12399
> 
> 
> 
>> From: Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
>> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:05:26 +0000
>> To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
>> 
>> Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit?
>> 
>> 
>> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
-
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-test mailing list
>> Assp-test@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Cheers.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdickson@...] 
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:02 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....

http://www.kirsle.net/doc/perl510.html




Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdickson@...
301-600-2399/x12399



> From: Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list 
> <assp-test@...>
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:20:47 +0000
> To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
> 
> Downloading now, your doc would be welcome...
> Thanks
> steve
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul K. Dickson [mailto:pdickson@...]
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:14 PM
> To: ASSP development mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
> 
> Doesn't matter.
> 
> 
> Paul K. Dickson
> Systems Administrator
> Interagency Information Technologies
> Frederick County Government
> Frederick, MD 21701
> pdickson@...
> 301-600-2399/x12399
> 
> 
> 
>> From: Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
>> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list 
>> <assp-test@...>
>> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:05:26 +0000
>> To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] What platform is best.....
>> 
>> Do you use 32 bit or 64 bit?
>> 
>> 
>> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------->>
-
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-test mailing list
>> Assp-test@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

> That said... I don't use that list, so got no problems :)

just in case, at the moment I'm using the following WLs

hul.habeas.com
query.bondedsender.org
iadb.isipp.com

I removed "list.dnswl.org" from the above since imHo
it's not so "reliable" (let's say it's too "permissive"); then 
btw I also use the senderbase informations to whitelist a
number of organizations even if the sending IP isn't on
a whitelist

Ah ha!  Good catch!!!

You'd think that they'd simply not reply if the service was
discontinued, not just say all ok....

Thanks as always GrayHat for your insight.


On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:49 AM, GrayHat <grayhat@...> wrote:
>
>> I saw this on my system this morning (while testing a new release) -
>> but the mail reached the PB and was blocked. Is there a problem with '
>> exemptions.ahbl.org' ?
>
> dig 2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org TXT
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org. IN      TXT
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 2.0.0.127.exemptions.ahbl.org. 3599 IN  TXT     "This service has been
> retired.
>  Please stop using exemptions.ahbl.org"
>
> clear enough, isn't it :) ? Now, since they retired the service quite
> some
> time ago, yet people kept querying the zone they decided to return a
> "whitelisted" to ALL queries so that someone would eventually realize
> there's something "wrong" <g>
>
> That said... I don't use that list, so got no problems :)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>

Set

ValidateUserLog to diagnostic
allLogReRE - to a domain or user

you should see more information in the log.

Thomas



Von:    Michael <assp@...>
An:     assp-test@...
Datum:  30.04.2010 12:47
Betreff:        [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 
1.0.13



Hello @all!

Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. 
with unchanged assp.cfg

At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local 
adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for 
all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs:

V 1.7.1.5
Apr-29-10 06:10:27 user@... matches user@... in 
LocalAddresses_Flat;

V 2.0.1
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2xxxxx7 
<returnto@...> invalid address rejected: user@...
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> 
Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address user@..., total score 
for this message is now 10
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> [SMTP 
Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown

Any hints?



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test




DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp & pasted the addresses back in....

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael [mailto:assp@...] 
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:28 AM
To: assp-test@...
Subject: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13

Hello @all!

Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. with unchanged assp.cfg

At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs:

V 1.7.1.5
Apr-29-10 06:10:27 user@... matches user@... in LocalAddresses_Flat;

V 2.0.1
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> invalid address rejected: user@...
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address user@..., total score for this message is now 10
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> [SMTP Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown

Any hints?



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Now I found:
Apr-30-10 13:52:37 [Worker_2] VRFY - user@... not found in LDAPlist

although I do not have any LDAP - Paramters set to ON. I am using still the "old" assp.cfg from V1. It looks like V2 does not lookup local.txt.
No references to RegEx.

Deleting local.txt and pasting the addresses again does not help.

Zitat von Thomas Eckardt <Thomas.Eckardt@...>:

> Set
>
> ValidateUserLog to diagnostic
> allLogReRE - to a domain or user
>
> you should see more information in the log.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:    Michael <assp@...>
> An:     assp-test@...
> Datum:  30.04.2010 12:47
> Betreff:        [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1
> 1.0.13
>
>
>
> Hello @all!
>
> Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1.
> with unchanged assp.cfg
>
> At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local
> adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for
> all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs:
>
> V 1.7.1.5
> Apr-29-10 06:10:27 user@... matches user@... in
> LocalAddresses_Flat;
>
> V 2.0.1
> Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2xxxxx7
> <returnto@...> invalid address rejected: user@...
> Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...>
> Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address user@..., total score
> for this message is now 10
> Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> [SMTP
> Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown
>
> Any hints?
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
>
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
>
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

>Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the 
file, saved it, restarted asp & pasted the addresses back in....

And what is the difference between the two files (old <-> new)?

Thomas



Von:    Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
An:     ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Datum:  30.04.2010 13:30
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 
1.0.13



Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the 
file, saved it, restarted asp & pasted the addresses back in....

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael [mailto:assp@...] 
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:28 AM
To: assp-test@...
Subject: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13

Hello @all!

Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. 
with unchanged assp.cfg

At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local 
adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for 
all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs:

V 1.7.1.5
Apr-29-10 06:10:27 user@... matches user@... in 
LocalAddresses_Flat;

V 2.0.1
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2xxxxx7 
<returnto@...> invalid address rejected: user@...
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> 
Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address user@..., total score 
for this message is now 10
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> [SMTP 
Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown

Any hints?



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test




DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

> Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared 
> the file, saved it, restarted asp & pasted the addresses back in....

Sounds like the file (or at least its "image" in memory) got corrupted

>Sounds like the file (or at least its "image" in memory) got corrupted

The directory ...../files/optRE  contains the more or less optimized 
regular expressions (memory) .

Thomas




Von:    "GrayHat" <grayhat@...>
An:     "ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@...>
Datum:  30.04.2010 14:11
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 
1.0.13



> Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared 
> the file, saved it, restarted asp & pasted the addresses back in....

Sounds like the file (or at least its "image" in memory) got corrupted


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test




DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

Nothing....

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:Thomas.Eckardt@...] 
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 9:09 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13

>Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared 
>the
file, saved it, restarted asp & pasted the addresses back in....

And what is the difference between the two files (old <-> new)?

Thomas



Von:    Steve Moffat <Steve@...>
An:     ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Datum:  30.04.2010 13:30
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 
1.0.13



Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the file, saved it, restarted asp & pasted the addresses back in....

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael [mailto:assp@...]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:28 AM
To: assp-test@...
Subject: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 1.0.13

Hello @all!

Actually i have 1.7.1.5 running perfectly and tried to switch to 2.0.1. 
with unchanged assp.cfg

At first it looks running very well but I´ve noticed that the local adresses are not looked up by V2 anymore leading to not received mails for all users listed in file:local.txt. Here you´ll find the Logs:

V 1.7.1.5
Apr-29-10 06:10:27 user@... matches user@... in LocalAddresses_Flat;

V 2.0.1
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] [InvalidAddress] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> invalid address rejected: user@...
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...>
Message-Score: added 10 for invalid address user@..., total score for this message is now 10
Apr-29-10 09:48:47 id-27327-01647 [Worker_3] 2xxxxx7 <returnto@...> [SMTP Error] 550 5.1.1 User unknown

Any hints?



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test




DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

Now, after deleting /lib/Regex/* it is working again as expected so far. So I guessthat there is some problem with the Regexoptimizer.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Just send me the optimized version of your flat file 
(files/optRE/LocalAddresses_Flat.txt).

Thomas




Von:    Michael <assp@...>
An:     ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Datum:  30.04.2010 15:02
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1 
1.0.13





Now, after deleting /lib/Regex/* it is working again as expected so far. 
So I guessthat there is some problem with the Regexoptimizer.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test




DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
schreibt:
>Are you referring to 2.0.0.5 or a dev build?

2.0.05 and dev build