More possible problems. After disabling the regex assp does not die on 2
servers, however sometimes on both of these servers assp stops accepting new
requests. So I looked at the maillog file during one of these problems and
found the following:
Mar-24-10 13:50:49 [Worker_12] Error: Worker_12 accept to client failed
IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x118cc5c8) (timeout: 2 s) : Too many open files
Mar-24-10 13:50:49 [Worker_12] Error: Worker_12 accept to client failed
IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x11907ee0) (timeout: 2 s) : Too many open files
Mar-24-10 13:50:49 [Worker_12] Error: Worker_12 accept to client failed
IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x9b0fd500) (timeout: 2 s) : Too many open files
Mar-24-10 13:50:49 [Worker_12] Error: Worker_12 accept to client failed
IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x936fd6f0) (timeout: 2 s) : Too many open files
Mar-24-10 13:50:49 [Worker_12] Error: Worker_12 accept to client failed
IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x9342ec98) (timeout: 2 s) : Too many open files
Mar-24-10 13:50:49 [Worker_12] Error: Worker_12 accept to client failed
IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x936785f0) (timeout: 2 s) : Too many open files
After that the server stopped responding to requests on port 25 but assp was
still running. I find this error interesting because I had already
increased the number of open files allowed for the assp user the server runs
as several months ago to 65500 in the /etc/security/limits.conf file. I
verified these changes were valid by doing 'ulimit -a' as the assp user. I
find it hard to believe assp has 65,500 files open??? After all I am using
the mysql db and berkeley db for most everything now. So how come assp has
so many files open? Is it possible that assp does not close open files
correctly and as it runs throughout time this number just keeps increasing?
In addition to finding a resolution on this it would be nice if assp
automatically restarted itself in this case (which it did not do). Because
the restart would have fixed the issue.
Issue #2:
I have assp restart itself automatically in a cron job, it usually works
fine. However this time it looked like there was a problem retrieving the
griplist? See the error below. As a result ASSP never restarted correctly
and just sat their not processing any incoming requests until I restarted it
again.
- BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:16 [Worker_10] BerkeleyDB-CRT-ENV-ERROR Griplist:
BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:16 [Worker_10] BerkeleyDB-ENV-ERROR Griplist: Can't call
method "set_timeout" on an undefined value at (eval 1894) line 80.
- BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:17 [Worker_11] BerkeleyDB-CRT-ENV-ERROR Griplist:
BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:17 [Worker_11] BerkeleyDB-ENV-ERROR Griplist: Can't call
method "set_timeout" on an undefined value at (eval 1894) line 80.
- BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:18 [Worker_12] BerkeleyDB-CRT-ENV-ERROR Griplist:
BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:18 [Worker_12] BerkeleyDB-ENV-ERROR Griplist: Can't call
method "set_timeout" on an undefined value at (eval 1894) line 80.
- BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:18 [Worker_13] BerkeleyDB-CRT-ENV-ERROR Griplist:
BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:18 [Worker_13] BerkeleyDB-ENV-ERROR Griplist: Can't call
method "set_timeout" on an undefined value at (eval 1894) line 80.
- BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:18 [Worker_15] BerkeleyDB-CRT-ENV-ERROR Griplist:
BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:18 [Worker_15] BerkeleyDB-ENV-ERROR Griplist: Can't call
method "set_timeout" on an undefined value at (eval 1894) line 80.
- BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:18 [Worker_14] BerkeleyDB-CRT-ENV-ERROR Griplist:
BDB:Permission denied
Mar-25-10 00:00:18 [Worker_14] BerkeleyDB-ENV-ERROR Griplist: Can't call
method "set_timeout" on an undefined value at (eval 1894) line 80.
-----Original Message-----
From: assp-test-request@...
[mailto:assp-test-request@...]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 10:31 AM
To: assp-test@...
Subject: Assp-test Digest, Vol 32, Issue 49
Send Assp-test mailing list submissions to
assp-test@...
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
assp-test-request@...
You can reach the person managing the list at
assp-test-owner@...
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Assp-test digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. allowing an email to pass (Graziano)
2. Re: allowing an email to pass (Graziano)
3. PB verbose log (suggestion) (Graziano)
4. Re: Assp dying (Thomas Eckardt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:35:47 +0100
From: Graziano <dreamservice@...>
Subject: [Assp-test] allowing an email to pass
To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Message-ID: <4BAA3F63.1020606@...>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
How to allow to pass an email which use "test world" in the email subject ?
I am using Regular Expression to Identify Non-Spam** /(whiteRe)/ <#whiteRe>
in 1.7.1.2 but it does not work (it does not check the email subject too ?).
Graziano
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:38:57 +0100
From: Graziano <dreamservice@...>
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] allowing an email to pass
To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Message-ID: <4BAA4021.4020903@...>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
no it works , please forget, my fault
> How to allow to pass an email which use "test world" in the email subject
?
> I am using Regular Expression to Identify Non-Spam** /(whiteRe)/
> <#whiteRe> in 1.7.1.2 but it does not work (it does not check the
> email subject too ?).
>
> Graziano
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new
> software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively,
> and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-test mailing list
> Assp-test@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:58:38 +0100
From: Graziano <dreamservice@...>
Subject: [Assp-test] PB verbose log (suggestion)
To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Message-ID: <4BAA44BE.1050408@...>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello
when using PB verbose log isn't better having something like this (in a
single row) Mar-24-10 12:56:13 203.247.63.94 <scleroticsN@...>
to:
craig@... [scoring:+6=84] (PTR missing);
instead of this (in 2 rows) ?
Mar-24-10 12:56:13 203.247.63.94 <scleroticsN@...> to:
craig@... [scoring] (PTR missing); Mar-24-10 12:56:13 203.247.63.94
<scleroticsN@...> to:
craig@... added 6 (PTR missing), total score for IP '203.247.63.94'
is now 84;
Graziano
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:30:22 +0100
From: Thomas Eckardt <Thomas.Eckardt@...>
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Assp dying
To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Message-ID:
<tITC.06999ef23e.OF98233601.AEEAE56A-ONC12576F0.00601D51-C12576F0.00602796@...
hockar.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
maybe this will help
http://www.red-mercury.com/blog/eclectic-tech/perl-out-of-memory-with-soluti
on/
Thomas
Von: Scott MacLean <assp@...>
An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
Datum: 24.03.2010 16:35
Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] Assp dying
Still seeing out of memory errors in 2.0.2 1.0.07:
Out of memory!
Callback called exit at assp.pl line 17744.
Out of memory!
Callback called exit at assp.pl line 17769.
At 03:35 PM 3/23/2010, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
> >while (time - $itime <= $maxBombSearchTime && $text =~ s/($regex)//)
> >{
>this should be improved since 2.0.2 1.0.06 - try the full regexes
>
>
> >($ret) = ('4'.unpack 'B32', pack 'C4', split /\./xms,
$ip)=~/($reRE)/xms;
>
>This could not be changed.
>
> >per the debugSignal.txt file:
>what an unexpected signal is found ?
>
>Thomas
>
>
>
>
>Von: "Masood Rahim" <masood@...>
>An: <assp-test@...>
>Datum: 22.03.2010 18:26
>Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] Assp dying
>
>
>
>
>So after using the mysql db and tweaking some settings on 2 servers
>here are my findings on my problem:
>
>Both servers die complaining about the following line in the
>debugSignal.txt (I think this might be related to Scott's issue):
>while (time - $itime <= $maxBombSearchTime && $text =~ s/($regex)//) {
>
>I turned off all the regex/spam bomb stuff and that error went away.
>As
a
>result one server has been online for almost 72 hours straight without
>having the assp process die. The other server still keeps dying at the
>following line (CIDR section) as per the debugSignal.txt file:
>
>($ret) = ('4'.unpack 'B32', pack 'C4', split /\./xms,
>$ip)=~/($reRE)/xms;
>
>Masood
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: assp-test-request@...
>[mailto:assp-test-request@...]
>Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 1:51 PM
>To: assp-test@...
>Subject: Assp-test Digest, Vol 32, Issue 40
>
>Send Assp-test mailing list submissions to
> assp-test@...
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> assp-test-request@...
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> assp-test-owner@...
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than
>"Re: Contents of Assp-test digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Delay broken ? (Pascal Dreissen)
> 2. Re: Delay broken ? (Thomas Eckardt)
> 3. Re: Delay broken ? (Thomas Eckardt)
> 4. Re: Delay broken ? (Pascal Dreissen)
> 5. Re: Delay broken ? (Thomas Eckardt)
> 6. Assp 2.0.2 1.0.05 (admin)
> 7. Assp 2.0.2 1.0.05 error (admin)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:29:54 +0100
>From: Pascal Dreissen <pascal@...>
>Subject: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
>To: development mailing list ASSP <assp-test@...>
>Message-ID:
<Frog.46999a4693.CA5ADEC0-F474-4DA1-8A8C-06E55DE7EE45@...>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>I am seeing these entries a lot since 1.0.0.3 (2.0.2)
>
>Mar-21-10 17:26:32 lnxmail01-88792-05243 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [TLS-out]
>194.48.214.21 <bounce-nl-708064@...> late triplet
>encountered,
>deleting: (194.48.214.0,bounce-nl-#@moneymiljonair.nl,xxxx@...)
>waited:
>14689d 16h 26m 32s
>
>Is the delay mechanism broken ? Because the above message repeats
>comming in (so the triplet is not removed from the db) I Tried:
>
>1) Stopping ASSP and deleting delaydb, which did not help, still these
>message come in.
>
>Perl 5.10.1
>ASSP 2.0.2 (1.0.03)
>
>Grtz,
>
>Pascal
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:52:29 +0100
>From: Thomas Eckardt <Thomas.Eckardt@...>
>Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
>To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>Message-ID:
>
><tITC.569621c0dd.OFBF1A0728.DFCDDBCF-ONC12576ED.006782D3-C12576ED.0067A
>BED@...
>hockar.com>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> >14689d 16h 26m 32s
>
>There is value of '0' returned - there must be a bug in the new fetch
sub.
>
>Thomas
>
>
>
>
>Von: Pascal Dreissen <pascal@...>
>An: development mailing list ASSP <assp-test@...>
>Datum: 21.03.2010 17:50
>Betreff: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
>
>
>
>I am seeing these entries a lot since 1.0.0.3 (2.0.2)
>
>Mar-21-10 17:26:32 lnxmail01-88792-05243 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [TLS-out]
>194.48.214.21 <bounce-nl-708064@...> late triplet
>encountered,
>deleting:
>(194.48.214.0,bounce-nl-#@moneymiljonair.nl,xxxx@...) waited:
>14689d 16h 26m 32s
>
>Is the delay mechanism broken ? Because the above message repeats
>comming in (so the triplet is not removed from the db) I Tried:
>
>1) Stopping ASSP and deleting delaydb, which did not help, still these
>message come in.
>
>Perl 5.10.1
>ASSP 2.0.2 (1.0.03)
>
>Grtz,
>
>Pascal
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>--
>Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools
>for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune
>applications for parallel performance.
>See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>_______________________________________________
>Assp-test mailing list
>Assp-test@...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
>DISCLAIMER:
>*******************************************************
>This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
>legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the
>use of
the
>
>
>individual to whom it is addressed.
>This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>known virus in this email!
>*******************************************************
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:05:27 +0100
>From: Thomas Eckardt <Thomas.Eckardt@...>
>Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
>To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>Message-ID:
>
><tITC.3696824936.OF00996791.2334ECEF-ONC12576ED.0068C214-C12576ED.0068D
>C00@...
>hockar.com>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Pascal - please try 2.0.2 1.0.05 from CVS !
>
>Thomas
>
>
>
>
>Von: Pascal Dreissen <pascal@...>
>An: development mailing list ASSP <assp-test@...>
>Datum: 21.03.2010 17:50
>Betreff: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
>
>
>
>I am seeing these entries a lot since 1.0.0.3 (2.0.2)
>
>Mar-21-10 17:26:32 lnxmail01-88792-05243 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [TLS-out]
>194.48.214.21 <bounce-nl-708064@...> late triplet
>encountered, deleting:
>(194.48.214.0,bounce-nl-#@moneymiljonair.nl,xxxx@...) waited:
>14689d 16h 26m 32s
>
>Is the delay mechanism broken ? Because the above message repeats
>comming in (so the triplet is not removed from the db) I Tried:
>
>1) Stopping ASSP and deleting delaydb, which did not help, still these
>message come in.
>
>Perl 5.10.1
>ASSP 2.0.2 (1.0.03)
>
>Grtz,
>
>Pascal
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>--
>Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools
>for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune
>applications for parallel performance.
>See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>_______________________________________________
>Assp-test mailing list
>Assp-test@...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
>DISCLAIMER:
>*******************************************************
>This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
>legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the
>use of
the
>
>
>individual to whom it is addressed.
>This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>known virus in this email!
>*******************************************************
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:13:54 +0100
>From: Pascal Dreissen <pascal@...>
>Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
>To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>Message-ID: <E8BA38BD-9C1C-4AEA-8DDE-C01A1AF43F84@...>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>I can confirm, is working again .. thanks!
>
>Op 21 mrt 2010, om 20:05 heeft Thomas Eckardt het volgende geschreven:
>
> > Pascal - please try 2.0.2 1.0.05 from CVS !
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: Pascal Dreissen <pascal@...>
> > An: development mailing list ASSP
<assp-test@...>
> > Datum: 21.03.2010 17:50
> > Betreff: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
> >
> >
> >
> > I am seeing these entries a lot since 1.0.0.3 (2.0.2)
> >
> > Mar-21-10 17:26:32 lnxmail01-88792-05243 [Worker_1] [TLS-in]
> > [TLS-out]
> > 194.48.214.21 <bounce-nl-708064@...> late triplet
> > encountered, deleting:
> > (194.48.214.0,bounce-nl-#@moneymiljonair.nl,xxxx@...) waited:
14689d
>
> > 16h 26m 32s
> >
> > Is the delay mechanism broken ? Because the above message repeats
>comming
> > in (so the triplet is not removed from the db) I Tried:
> >
> > 1) Stopping ASSP and deleting delaydb, which did not help, still
> > these message come in.
> >
> > Perl 5.10.1
> > ASSP 2.0.2 (1.0.03)
> >
> > Grtz,
> >
> > Pascal
> >
> >
> >
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>--
> > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools
> > for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune
> > applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Assp-test mailing list
> > Assp-test@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > DISCLAIMER:
> > *******************************************************
> > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
>legally
> > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use
> > of
>the
>
> >
> > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be
> > no known virus in this email!
> > *******************************************************
> >
> >
> >
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>--
> > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools
> > for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune
> > applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> >
>
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev____________________________________________
>
>___
> > Assp-test mailing list
> > Assp-test@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:33:05 +0100
>From: Thomas Eckardt <Thomas.Eckardt@...>
>Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
>To: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>Message-ID:
>
><tITC.9696e8771c.OF19E055B6.B3861CF5-ONC12576ED.006B39F0-C12576ED.006B6
>35B@...
>hockar.com>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>I'm sorry. It was caused by a missing semicolon ';' - which was not
>(like
>expected) resulting in a syntax error.
>
>Thomas
>
>
>
>
>Von: Pascal Dreissen <pascal@...>
>An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@...>
>Datum: 21.03.2010 20:14
>Betreff: Re: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
>
>
>
>I can confirm, is working again .. thanks!
>
>Op 21 mrt 2010, om 20:05 heeft Thomas Eckardt het volgende geschreven:
>
> > Pascal - please try 2.0.2 1.0.05 from CVS !
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: Pascal Dreissen <pascal@...>
> > An: development mailing list ASSP
<assp-test@...>
> > Datum: 21.03.2010 17:50
> > Betreff: [Assp-test] Delay broken ?
> >
> >
> >
> > I am seeing these entries a lot since 1.0.0.3 (2.0.2)
> >
> > Mar-21-10 17:26:32 lnxmail01-88792-05243 [Worker_1] [TLS-in]
> > [TLS-out]
> > 194.48.214.21 <bounce-nl-708064@...> late triplet
> > encountered, deleting:
> > (194.48.214.0,bounce-nl-#@moneymiljonair.nl,xxxx@...) waited:
14689d
>
>
> > 16h 26m 32s
> >
> > Is the delay mechanism broken ? Because the above message repeats
>comming
> > in (so the triplet is not removed from the db) I Tried:
> >
> > 1) Stopping ASSP and deleting delaydb, which did not help, still
> > these message come in.
> >
> > Perl 5.10.1
> > ASSP 2.0.2 (1.0.03)
> >
> > Grtz,
> >
> > Pascal
> >
> >
> >
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>--
> > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools
> > for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune
> > applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Assp-test mailing list
> > Assp-test@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > DISCLAIMER:
> > *******************************************************
> > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
>legally
> > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use
> > of
>the
> >
> > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be
> > no known virus in this email!
> > *******************************************************
> >
> >
> >
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>--
> > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools
> > for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune
> > applications for parallel performance.
> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> >
>
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev____________________________________________
>
>___
>
> > Assp-test mailing list
> > Assp-test@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>--
>Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools
>for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune
>applications for parallel performance.
>See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>_______________________________________________
>Assp-test mailing list
>Assp-test@...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
>DISCLAIMER:
>*******************************************************
>This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
>legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the
>use of
the
>
>
>individual to whom it is addressed.
>This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>known virus in this email!
>*******************************************************
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:38:01 +0100
>From: "admin" <admin@...>
>Subject: [Assp-test] Assp 2.0.2 1.0.05
>To: <assp-test@...>
>Message-ID: <4BA691B902000013000004C2@...>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>Hallo Thomas,
>here is an other mistake in that Version :
>
>M?r-21-10 to run
>line 60.
>line 1.
>line 1.
>
>Bye the way, have you an idea, why assp write "M?r" as month in the
>logfile ?
>
>Best regards
>Ralf
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:46:25 +0100
>From: "admin" <admin@...>
>Subject: [Assp-test] Assp 2.0.2 1.0.05 error
>To: <assp-test@...>
>Message-ID: <4BA693B102000013000004CC@...>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>Sorry but the Error-Message from my last mail is broken.
>
>M?r-21-10 21:27:27 [Worker_10001] Error: rebuildspamdb failed - Global
>symbol "$VerBerkeley" requires explicit package name at rebuildspamdbpm
>line 60.
>Compilation failed in require at (eval 846) line 1.
>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 846) line 1.
>M?r-21-10 21:27:27 [Worker_10001] INFO: RebuildSpamdb removed from
>queue
>
>
>Best regards
>Ralf
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>--
>Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools
>for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune
>applications for parallel performance.
>See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Assp-test mailing list
>Assp-test@...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>End of Assp-test Digest, Vol 32, Issue 40
>*****************************************
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>------- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software
>tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and
>fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>_______________________________________________
>Assp-test mailing list
>Assp-test@...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>
>
>
>
>DISCLAIMER:
>*******************************************************
>This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
>legally privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the
>use of
the
>
>individual to whom it is addressed.
>This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>known virus in this email!
>*******************************************************
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>------- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software
>tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and
>fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>_______________________________________________
>Assp-test mailing list
>Assp-test@...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for
yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications
for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no known
virus in this email!
*******************************************************
------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
End of Assp-test Digest, Vol 32, Issue 49
*****************************************
|