artifactory-users Mailing List for Artifactory

Dear srujan kumar,

We would like to acknowledge that we have received your request and a ticket has been created with ticket ID - 48406.

A support representative will be reviewing your request and will send you a personal response.

If your subscription does not include customer support services or a SLA-based response time, please anticipate a delayed response.

To get more information about our support options, including questions related to your custom environment, please email su...@jf....

Thank you for your patience.

Sincerely,

JFrog Support Team



ref:_00D20M3v0._500w01O4tjM:ref

May be my response is too late,

As long as you have valid license you can upgrade to any version.
Have you taken the whole system backup? This is used to fall back to older version if incase.
I would suggest to try “running as rpm installation” which is just one command run process, very easy and quick

Thank You,
-Sagi

From: Miguel Lanz [mailto:edg...@gm...]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 10:11 AM
To: art...@li...
Subject: [Artifactory-users] Upgrading from Artifactory Version 4.5.0 to Artifactory Version 4.12.0

Hello everyone,

I currently have a stand alone server running Arfifactory Pro Version 4.5.0 and I would like to upgrade to Artifactory most recent release.

Question I have is the following:

1- My current Artifactory Pro License expires on  November of this year. Would I be able to upgrade to the latest version of Artifactory before my license for 4.5.0 expires, or do I need to purchase a separate license for 4.12.0?

The reason I asked is because I did go through the upgrade process from 4.5.0 to 4.12.0 and as soon as I started Artifactory, when I logged in I was prompt to enter a license. Also even though there were no errors in the logs and everything started clean, all of my configs for LDAP, Users, and over 8000 artifact were not showing up on the new version after I upgraded following the instructions for stand alone server here: https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/RTF/Upgrading+Artifactory

Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
-Edgar

Hello everyone,

I currently have a stand alone server running Arfifactory Pro Version 4.5.0
and I would like to upgrade to Artifactory most recent release.

Question I have is the following:

1- My current Artifactory Pro License expires on  November of this year.
Would I be able to upgrade to the latest version of Artifactory before my
license for 4.5.0 expires, or do I need to purchase a separate license for
4.12.0?

The reason I asked is because I did go through the upgrade process from
4.5.0 to 4.12.0 and as soon as I started Artifactory, when I logged in I
was prompt to enter a license. Also even though there were no errors in the
logs and everything started clean, all of my configs for LDAP, Users, and
over 8000 artifact were not showing up on the new version after I upgraded
following the instructions for stand alone server here:
https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/RTF/Upgrading+Artifactory

Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
-Edgar

Dear friends, we are moving to a better place!

Since today please use StackOverfow.com for community support for all
things JFrog – Artifactory, Bintray, Mission Control and Xray.

When asking and using the appropriate tags (e.g. [artifactory], [bintray]
or [jfrog-mission-control]), you'll see a JFrog logo on them. That means we
(JFrog) are there to help.

The mailing list will no longer accept new emails and the
http://forums.jfrog.org will serve as read-only archive.

Thank you for being JFrog users and keep asking, answering and being the
best community ever!

Baruch

JFrog Developer Advocate.

Dear friends, we are moving to a better place!
Since today please use StackOverfow.com for community support for all things
JFrog – Artifactory, Bintray, Mission Control and Xray.

When asking and using the appropriate tags (e.g. [artifactory], [bintray] or
[jfrog-mission-control]), you'll see a JFrog logo on them. That means we're
there to help.

The mailing list will no longer accept new emails and the
http://forums.jfrog.org will serve as read-only archive.

Thank you for being JFrog users and keep asking, answering and being the
best community ever!

Baruch

JFrog Developer Advocate.



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Closing-this-mailing-list-and-forum-in-favor-of-StackOverflow-tp7581183.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Is it possible to search multiple repositories using the CLI? (or why isn't
it possible)?

jfrog rt s "somerepo-local/*" --props "git_sha=cc403f8d...57da8649802"
gives the correct result, but we have multiple artifacts from the same
build, and I don't want to specify one search for each repository, as they
might be different depending on the type of project.

I can work around this with a virtual repo on top of everything, although
not optimal. 

Also, is there any ways to do cli property updates? Currently I find no
hints for doing that in the cli. We need  to do promotion in the respective
repositories, and I am looking for a simple way of handling that in
scripts/cli.





--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/jfrog-cli-search-multiple-repositories-tp7581182.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi,
I am behind a corporate firewall with NTLM v2 authentication. How should I
define the proxy settings specifically? I have tried almost all combinations
but with no luck.
 Are there any specific way to create the passphrase? I have used cntlm for
this.

Thanks, Oyvind  



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/NTLM-v2-authetication-tp7581181.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello I am having an issue with an NPM virtual repo configuration that I was
hoping someone might be able to help with.I am using Artifactory 4.3.3
behind a corporate proxy and I am an Artifactory admin. Artifactory has been
used to host several different kinds of artifacts successfully, but I am
having an issue with NPM. I configured the proxy access and validated that
the connection is working. I then created a virtual npm repo which is backed
by a local npm repo and a remote (proxy) npm repo. In the remote repo, I am
connecting to https://registry.npmjs.org and I am able to validate the
connection.From a linux shell, I was able to call the auth API and get back
the auth information to place inside of my local .npmrc. Then, I tried an
npm install of rimraf (and a few other small packages). I can see that npm
is talking to the virtual repo and the package.json is being imported into
the remote repo and local cache but the install fails and generates an
npm-debug file. The debug file shows that fetches of tar files from the npm
registry are failing.Here is an excerpt from the npm-debug log, with server
and port modified:61 verbose addRemoteTarball
http://:/api/npm/myvirtual-repo/rimraf/-/rimraf-2.5.4.tgz not in flight;
adding62 verbose addRemoteTarball [
'http://:/api/npm/myvirtual-repo/rimraf/-/rimraf-2.5.4.tgz',62 verbose
addRemoteTarball   '96800093cbf1a0c86bd95b4625467535c29dfa04' ]63 info retry
fetch attempt 1 at 12:39:52 PM64 info attempt registry request try #1 at
12:39:52 PM65 http fetch GET
http://:/api/npm/myvirtual-repo/rimraf/-/rimraf-2.5.4.tgz66 http fetch 404
http://:/api/npm/myvirtual-repo/rimraf/-/rimraf-2.5.4.tgz67 error fetch
failed http://:/api/npm/myvirtual-repo/rimraf/-/rimraf-2.5.4.tgz68 warn
retry will retry, error on last attempt: Error: fetch failed with status
code404 Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank-you!



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/NPM-installs-failing-when-using-Virtual-Repo-configuration-tp7581180.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi Daniel,

The time it takes to export and import depends on many factors, but 8 hours
for a ~400GB repository sounds about right.

HTH,
Itamar



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Importing-an-Repository-of-size-10GB-in-production-artifactory-tp7581175p7581179.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Just to give you a data point, we're in the process of migrating from an
old Artifactory 2.6.6 instance to a new Artifactory Pro 4.10, and
exporting libs-release-local which has 403GB takes about 8h and
importing it takes about 7h30mins.

HTH,
Daniel Serodio

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, at 12:00 AM, andreik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Importing a repository with any size should be feasible, you may add
> Verbose
> logging and inspect your System Logs to closely monitor the process.
> 
> Take notice that importing or exporting large repositories could be time
> consuming, however, this process runs in the background once initiated.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrei
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://forums.jfrog.org/Importing-an-Repository-of-size-10GB-in-production-artifactory-tp7581175p7581176.html
> Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Artifactory-users mailing list
> Art...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users

Hi Ken,

I haven't set up git LFS but the attached diagram shows how I'd expect to set it up, following the pattern we use for Ivy and Maven repos.

Each site has

*       some local repo(s);

*       an "foo-outgoing" virtual repo which includes only the local repo(s);

*       an "other-site-foo" remote repo for each other site, which points to the other "-outgoing" repos;

*       a "foo" virtual repo which includes "foo-outgoing" (i.e., all the relevant local repos from "this" site) and all "other-site-foo" repos (i.e., just the relevant local repos from all other sites)

Developers then pull from "foo" and deploy either to some "foo-local" or, with Artifactory 4.x, also just deploy to the virtual "foo" which is configured to deploy by default to one of the "foo-local" repos.

This avoids having site A's remote view of site B include any remotes at B which point back to A.  If you have that then, depending on repository order, you can end up with server A finding some path matches first in a remote of some repo at B, and that match at B is in a remote which points back to A, but the path isn't yet cached at B.  At that point you'll get a 404 because caching of remote artifacts doesn't "chain" across servers.

At least, that's how we do it.  If someone can suggest a simpler way, I'm happy to hear it :-)

Regards,

Hugh Greene
Senior Software Developer
Toshiba Medical Visualization Systems Europe, Ltd
Bonnington Bond, 2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh EH6 5NP, UK
P 44 (0)131 472 4792 | F + 44 (0) 131 472 4799
E mailto:hg...@tm... | W http://www.tmvse.com<http://www.tmvse.com/>

DISCLAIMER
Unless indicated otherwise, the information contained in this message is privileged and confidential, and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and/or attachments is strictly prohibited. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Furthermore, the company does not warrant a proper and complete transmission of this information, nor does it accept liability for any delays. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the message.

From: O'Connell, Ken [mailto:ken...@co...]
Sent: 23 August 2016 21:24
To: art...@li...
Subject: [Artifactory-users] replication endpoint urls and Git LFS

Good day all,

We are trying to understand exactly how we can ensure objects/ artifacts (once they are replicated to remote Artifactory instance) will be pulled from remote Artifactory instance that is local to the replicated location, and not from the original server where the object was originally deployed.
We want to ensure users (as well as our automated build scripts) in Europe will pull (new/ changed) objects that were replicated to European Artifactory servers, and will NOT be pulled from the Artifactory server back in the United States where the original local repo resides.

How is that typically done? How are the different repository types (local, remote, virtual) used in this setup?

i.e.

*       Developer 1 (US):                            -creates a SCM repo (in Bitbucket) with a .lfsconfig file containing the 'local-testrepo' url for Artifactory.
[lfs]
url = "http://artifactory:XXXX/artifactory/api/lfs/extern-local"

*       Developer 1 (US):                            -pushes new or changed code that lands in the US local-testrepo, and is then replicated to Europe Artifactory server repo.

*       Developer 2 (EU):                            -retrieves the new code from European Artifactory server

o   Automated script:           -retrieves the new code from European Artifactory server

*       Developer 2 (EU):                            -pushes his code changes to European Artifactory server (which are replicated back to US, OR are pushed (via git) directly back to US)


Thanks for any help you can provide, and please let me know if you need further info.

-K


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

Hello,

Importing a repository with any size should be feasible, you may add Verbose
logging and inspect your System Logs to closely monitor the process.

Take notice that importing or exporting large repositories could be time
consuming, however, this process runs in the background once initiated.

Regards,
Andrei



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Importing-an-Repository-of-size-10GB-in-production-artifactory-tp7581175p7581176.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

<div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10.5pt" ><div dir="ltr" ><div>I would like to import a repository of size 10Gb in Production artifactory. Please let me know whether it is feasible or not. and also Please let me know the consequences of that.</div>
<div>Thanks<br>Mounisha</div></div></div><BR>

Hi, 
   
 You can find all relevant information about Docker registry & REST API's here and here respectively. 
   
   
 Regards, 
 Tim 
 JFrog Support   
    
 
 
                 
         On Fri, 26 Aug at 12:55 PM
          ,  Ryz.namathp <ryz...@gm...>  wrote:
           
 I am looking for REST API to delete docker artifacts from JForg registry 
 
 
 
 --
 View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Delete-docker-image-from-Artifactory-tp7581173.html
 Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 _______________________________________________
 Artifactory-users mailing list
 Art...@li...
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users

I am looking for REST API to delete docker artifacts from JForg registry 



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Delete-docker-image-from-Artifactory-tp7581173.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I had the same same error but the cause was simple - user didn't have
permission to upload to the repo. 
This is clear from the gradle debug trace below. The plugin does PUT gets a
403 and for some reason tries the PUT again. The 2nd PUT results in the
Broken Pipe. Whatever, the problem was solved by granting the user upload
permission, PUT succeeds on 1st attempt. (gradle artifactory plugin 4.4.0,
artifactory 4.11.0)

10:14:21.510 [DEBUG]
[org.jfrog.gradle.plugin.artifactory.task.BuildInfoBaseTask] Uploading
artifacts to Artifactory at 'http://xxxx:8081/artifactory'
10:14:21.510 [LIFECYCLE]
[org.jfrog.gradle.plugin.artifactory.task.BuildInfoBaseTask] Deploying
artifact: http://xxxx:8081/artifactory/libs-release-local/org/xxxx.jar
10:14:21.517 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.impl.conn.BasicClientConnectionManager] Get connection for
route {}->http://xxxx:8081
10:14:21.517 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator] Connecting to
xxxx:8081
10:14:21.518 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestAddCookies]
CookieSpec selected: best-match
10:14:21.518 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestAuthCache] Auth
cache not set in the context
10:14:21.518 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestTargetAuthentication] Target auth
state: UNCHALLENGED
10:14:21.518 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestProxyAuthentication] Proxy auth
state: UNCHALLENGED
10:14:21.518 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient] Attempt
1 to execute request
10:14:21.518 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnection]
Sending request: GET /artifactory/api/system/version HTTP/1.1
10:14:21.521 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnection]
Receiving response: HTTP/1.1 200 OK
10:14:21.521 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient]
Connection can be kept alive indefinitely
10:14:21.522 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.impl.conn.BasicClientConnectionManager] Releasing
connection org.apache.http.impl.conn.ManagedClientConnectionImpl@252f2de5
10:14:21.522 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.impl.conn.BasicClientConnectionManager] Connection can be
kept alive indefinitely
10:14:21.522 [DEBUG]
[org.jfrog.gradle.plugin.artifactory.task.BuildInfoBaseTask] Version result:
{"version":"4.11.0","revision":"40239","addons":[],"license":"Artifactory
OSS"}
10:14:21.523 [DEBUG]
[org.jfrog.gradle.plugin.artifactory.task.BuildInfoBaseTask] Full Artifact
Http path: PUT
http://xxxx:8081/artifactory/libs-release-local/org/xxxx.jar;build.timestamp=1472026458568;build.name=xxxx;build.number=1472026458820
HTTP/1.1
@Http Headers: [X-Checksum-Sha1: b4dfb2a45625237baf5b238a54be5eab59840915,
X-Checksum-Md5: aa38c8b7e9334341d460c6195f8d4cfe]
10:14:21.523 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.impl.conn.BasicClientConnectionManager] Get connection for
route {}->http://xxxx:8081
10:14:21.523 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient] Stale
connection check
10:14:21.525 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestAddCookies]
CookieSpec selected: best-match
10:14:21.525 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestAuthCache] Auth
cache not set in the context
10:14:21.526 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestTargetAuthentication] Target auth
state: UNCHALLENGED
10:14:21.526 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestProxyAuthentication] Proxy auth
state: UNCHALLENGED
10:14:21.527 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient] Attempt
1 to execute request
10:14:21.527 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnection]
Sending request: PUT
/artifactory/libs-release-local/org/xxxx.jar;build.timestamp=1472026458568;build.name=xxxx;build.number=1472026458820
HTTP/1.1
10:14:21.531 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnection]
Receiving response: HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
10:14:21.531 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient]
Connection can be kept alive indefinitely
10:14:21.533 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.impl.conn.BasicClientConnectionManager] Releasing
connection org.apache.http.impl.conn.ManagedClientConnectionImpl@139fb628
10:14:21.533 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.impl.conn.BasicClientConnectionManager] Connection can be
kept alive indefinitely
10:14:21.545 [DEBUG]
[org.jfrog.gradle.plugin.artifactory.task.BuildInfoBaseTask] Failed checksum
deploy of checksum 'b4dfb2a45625237baf5b238a54be5eab59840915' with
statusCode: 403
10:14:21.546 [DEBUG]
[org.jfrog.gradle.plugin.artifactory.task.BuildInfoBaseTask] Full Artifact
Http path: PUT
http://xxxx:8081/artifactory/libs-release-local/org/xxxx.jar;build.timestamp=1472026458568;build.name=xxxx;build.number=1472026458820
HTTP/1.1
@Http Headers: [X-Checksum-Sha1: b4dfb2a45625237baf5b238a54be5eab59840915,
X-Checksum-Md5: aa38c8b7e9334341d460c6195f8d4cfe]
10:14:21.546 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.impl.conn.BasicClientConnectionManager] Get connection for
route {}->http://xxxx:8081
10:14:21.546 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient] Stale
connection check
10:14:21.548 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestAddCookies]
CookieSpec selected: best-match
10:14:21.548 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestAuthCache] Auth
cache not set in the context
10:14:21.548 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestTargetAuthentication] Target auth
state: UNCHALLENGED
10:14:21.548 [DEBUG]
[org.apache.http.client.protocol.RequestProxyAuthentication] Proxy auth
state: UNCHALLENGED
10:14:21.548 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient] Attempt
1 to execute request
10:14:21.549 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnection]
Sending request: PUT
/artifactory/libs-release-local/org/xxxx.jar;build.timestamp=1472026458568;build.name=xxxx;build.number=1472026458820
HTTP/1.1
10:14:21.550 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnection]
Receiving response: HTTP/1.1 100 Continue
10:14:21.556 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnection]
Connection 0.0.0.0:50290<->10.11.16.35:8081 closed
10:14:21.556 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient] Closing
the connection.
10:14:21.556 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnection]
Connection 0.0.0.0:50290<->10.11.16.35:8081 closed
10:14:21.557 [INFO] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient] I/O
exception (java.net.SocketException) caught when processing request: Broken
pipe
10:14:21.557 [DEBUG] [org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient] Broken
pipe
java.net.SocketException: Broken pipe
        at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite0(Native Method)
        at
java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(SocketOutputStream.java:109)
        at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:153)





--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Artifactory-Gradle-plugin-giving-broken-pipe-tp7580503p7581172.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Good day all,

We are trying to understand exactly how we can ensure objects/ artifacts (once they are replicated to remote Artifactory instance) will be pulled from remote Artifactory instance that is local to the replicated location, and not from the original server where the object was originally deployed.
We want to ensure users (as well as our automated build scripts) in Europe will pull (new/ changed) objects that were replicated to European Artifactory servers, and will NOT be pulled from the Artifactory server back in the United States where the original local repo resides.

How is that typically done? How are the different repository types (local, remote, virtual) used in this setup?

i.e.

*         Developer 1 (US):                            -creates a SCM repo (in Bitbucket) with a .lfsconfig file containing the 'local-testrepo' url for Artifactory.
[lfs]
url = "http://artifactory:XXXX/artifactory/api/lfs/extern-local"

*         Developer 1 (US):                            -pushes new or changed code that lands in the US local-testrepo, and is then replicated to Europe Artifactory server repo.

*         Developer 2 (EU):                            -retrieves the new code from European Artifactory server

o   Automated script:           -retrieves the new code from European Artifactory server

*         Developer 2 (EU):                            -pushes his code changes to European Artifactory server (which are replicated back to US, OR are pushed (via git) directly back to US)


Thanks for any help you can provide, and please let me know if you need further info.

-K

Hi Dunken / Armin,

Artifactory has an integration with Black Duck software, and BD are behind OpenHub, so that might do you.  JFrog have also just come out with version 1.0 of X-Ray, which integrates with Artifactory and seems to be sort of a framework for matching artifacts against data/rules from various sources and triggering various notifications.

We've looked into both of them a little.  So far it seems like Black Duck's products have a bigger database of vulnerabilities, does more out of the box, and probably integrates with more than just Artifactory.  On the other hand, X-Ray is a bit more customisable (it's almost a toolkit) but is still an "early days" product.  Depending on what you want to scan and how, you may find that one is significantly more expensive than the other.

We also found a couple of non-commercial things but haven't looked into them much:

	https://dependencyci.com/
	https://blog.versioneye.com/2016/06/28/versioneye-goes-open-source/

Hope that's useful

Hugh Greene
Senior Software Developer
Toshiba Medical Visualization Systems Europe, Ltd
Bonnington Bond, 2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh EH6 5NP, UK
P 44 (0)131 472 4792 | F + 44 (0) 131 472 4799
E mailto:hg...@tm... | W http://www.tmvse.com

DISCLAIMER
Unless indicated otherwise, the information contained in this message is privileged and confidential, and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and/or attachments is strictly prohibited. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Furthermore, the company does not warrant a proper and complete transmission of this information, nor does it accept liability for any delays. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the message.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dunken [mailto:arm...@si...] 
Sent: 17 August 2016 16:04
To: art...@li...
Subject: [Artifactory-users] Open-Hub-like plugin for Artifactory

I'm looking for a plugin for Artifactory which can be used for evaluating, tracking, and comparing open and closed source code and projects (something similar to Open Hub). Does something like this already exist? Is Artifactory even a good place for such plugins?

Many thanks!



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Open-Hub-like-plugin-for-Artifactory-tp7581162.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Artifactory-users mailing list
Art...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/artifactory-users

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

Hello,

I am running artifactory-oss 4.8.2 on an external tomcat.
During my attempts o upgrade to 4.10 and 4.11 I learnde that external tomcat
is no longer supported and I should switch to bundled tomcat.

Since I am running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, I followed the instructions for
installing artifactory-oss as a debian package.

I also followed the instructions for migrating from external servlet
container to bundled tomcat:
https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/RTF/Upgrading+Artifactory#UpgradingArtifactory-UpgradingWhenUsingExternalServletContainers

Unfortunately, I had to realise that my API Keys had changed after logging
into the new artifactory version.

The artifactory.log contains the following:
*[http-nio-8081-exec-9] [INFO ] (o.a.s.SecurityServiceImpl:1443) - Creating
keys for user 'MY_USER_NAME'*




--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/API-Keys-of-existing-users-change-after-upgrade-to-4-11-and-migration-to-bundled-tomcat-tp7581165.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I want to create a build which includes a number of artifacts that have been
deployed separately.  I can not get it to work.
To try to understand the issue I've made a small test case but it behaves
very strangely it seems to me.  It tries to do the following using curl
calls:
Delete the test repository
Create the test repository
Delete the build, if it remains from a previous run
Create the build, containing a test artifact
Promote the build to the test repository
When creating the build I use a json file which is a stripped down version
of the json file Maven left when I created the test artifact.
Now, the strange part I don't understand: the promotion step (5) fails if
the build is numbered 2.  It works if it is numbered 1.  Actually creating
the build works in both cases, it is the promotion that differs.  The error
message is
{  "errors" : [ {    "status" : 400,    "message" : "Unable to find
artifacts of build 'goerans-maven-bygge' #2: aborting promotion."  } ]}
I've looked at the builds and the repositories via the web interface to
Artifactory, but I don't see any explanation of what goes wrong.  I do see
that my test repository gets populated when promoting build 1, but not when
promoting build 2.
Details
The curl command used to create the build looks like this
curl -u … -X PUT -H 'Content-Type:
application/vnd.org.jfrog.artifactory+json' --upload
goerans-maven-bygge.1.json …/api/build
The contents of the json file is this:
{  "version" : "1.0.1",  "name" : "goerans-maven-bygge",  "number" : "1", 
"started" : "2016-08-17T14:01:54.222+0200",  "modules" : [ {    "id" :
"com.jeppesen.jcms:goerans-maven-bygge:1.0.0",    "artifacts" : [ {     
"type" : "pom",      "sha1" : "a1e1e32d511b6f481755808b80dff5f9d0d8249f",     
"md5" : "942c74d767a10a62ec0168544d97ca32",      "name" :
"goerans-maven-bygge-1.0.0.pom"    } ]  } ]}
When creating a build with number 2, the file sets number to 2, otherwise it
is the same.
When promoting the build; I use this curl command
curl -u … -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' --data
'{"status":"befordrad","ciUser":"göran","copy":
true,"targetRepo":"görans-förråd","properties":{"status":["befordrad"]}}'
…/api/build/promote/goerans-maven-bygge/1
This works, but when having created build 2 and thus having a 2 at the end
of the latter curl command, it fails with the error message mentioned above.




--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Some-builds-created-through-the-API-can-not-be-promoted-tp7581164.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hey everyone,

  We're a JFrog Artifactory Pro customer with our own instance.  That
instance is configured to authenticate users via our GitHub Enterprise
instance with OAuth.

  We'd like to try using the  Artifactory Gradle plugin
<https://plugins.gradle.org/plugin/com.jfrog.artifactory>  .

  However,  the documentation at
https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/rtf/gradle+artifactory+plugin
<https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/rtf/gradle+artifactory+plugin>  
only seems to offer configuration for authentication based on 'username' and
'password'— and we don't have passwords.

  Anyone here have any experience with the Gradle plugin?

  Thanks much for your time, and hope this finds you well!

Jake
ja...@um...



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Artifactory-Gradle-plugin-and-Artifactory-Pro-OAuth-configuration-tp7581163.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I'm looking for a plugin for Artifactory which can be used for evaluating,
tracking, and comparing open and closed source code and projects (something
similar to Open Hub). Does something like this already exist? Is Artifactory
even a good place for such plugins?

Many thanks!



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Open-Hub-like-plugin-for-Artifactory-tp7581162.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello,

I'm trying to integrate *openLdap via phpLDAPadmin* with *Artifactory*
Instruction followed
OpenLDAP - Installation and adding objects using phpldapadmin and ldapadd
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM_UQVVVtoY>  
Artifactory 3.X - Artifactory's LDAP Group Addon
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdZz0R6laxA>   (parameters for artifactory
3.x & 4.x seems same)

While "Test Connection" action, receiving an error "Failed to parse R\DN"
Error log message is as below
Failed to parse R\DN: Failed to parse DN; nested exception is
org.springframework.ldap.core.TokenMgrError: Lexical error at line 1, column
11.  Encountered: "/" (47), after : ""

<http://forums.jfrog.org/file/n7581161/Screenshot_from_2016-08-05_15_26_44.png> 
<http://forums.jfrog.org/file/n7581161/Screenshot_from_2016-08-05_15_26_25.png> 
<http://forums.jfrog.org/file/n7581161/Screenshot_from_2016-08-05_15_26_53.png> 





--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Artifactory-4-openldap-phpldapadmin-integration-tp7581161.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi,

I cannot deploy artifact to a local repo that I created after artifactory
installation (not libs-snapshot-local or libs-release-local) with Maven and
maven-deploy-plugin.
Earlier I tested my settings.xml and project pom by successfully uploading
to libs-snapshot-release. I'm not sure if I'm passing the correct id for the
local repo. Without further 
ado, here's my distributionManagement block in the project pom.

  <distributionManagement>
		<repository>
			<uniqueVersion>false</uniqueVersion>
			<id>my-thirdparty-lib</id>
			<name>my-thirdparty-lib</name>
			<url>http://localhost:8081/artifactory/my-thirdparty-lib</url>
		</repository>
  </distributionManagement>
  
Note that I tried putting the repo info above in a 'snapshotRepository'
block instead of 'repositiry'. But it didn't work or make a difference. Also
noticed that it doesn't allow 
you to have multiple of either bolcks.

And here are the 'servers' and 'profies' sections corresponding to the
specific local repo in my settings.xml. 

 <servers>
    
    <server>      
       <username>username</username>      
       <password>pswd</password>   
       <id>my-thirdparty-lib</id>   
    </server>
  
 </servers>
 
  <profiles>
    <profile>
      <repositories>       
        <repository>
          <snapshots>
            <enabled>false</enabled>
          </snapshots>
          <id>my-thirdparty-lib</id>
          <url>http://localhost:8081/artifactory/my-thirdparty-lib</url>
        </repository>
      </repositories>
      <id>artifactory</id>
    </profile>
  </profiles>

 When I'm running 'mvn deploy', getting following error while uploading.
 
 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.7:deploy (default-deploy) on
project xxxPackage: Failed to deploy artifacts: Could not transfer artifact
com.xxx.pro:xxxPackage:pom:12.5-20160809.173109-1 from/to my-thirdparty-lib
(http://localhost:8081/artifactory/my-thirdparty-lib): Failed to transfer
file:
http://localhost:8081/artifactory/my-thirdparty-lib/com/xxx/pro/xxxPackage/12.5-SNAPSHOT/xxxPackage-12.5-20160809.173109-1.pom.
Return code is: 409, ReasonPhrase: Conflict. -> [Help 1]
 
 I'm using Artifactory 3.9.2.
 





--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Deploy-Artifact-to-specific-repo-other-than-libs-snapshot-local-or-libs-release-local-with-maven-depn-tp7581153.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi,

I cannot deploy artifact to a local repo that I created after artifactory
installation (not libs-snapshot-local or libs-release-local) with Maven and
maven-deploy-plugin.
Earlier I tested my settings.xml and project pom by successfully uploading
to libs-snapshot-release. I'm not sure if I'm passing the correct id for the
local repo. Without further 
ado, here's my distributionManagement block in the project pom.

  <distributionManagement>
		<repository>
			<uniqueVersion>false</uniqueVersion>
			<id>my-thirdparty-lib</id>
			<name>my-thirdparty-lib</name>
			<url>http://localhost:8081/artifactory/my-thirdparty-lib</url>
		</repository>
  </distributionManagement>
  
Note that I tried putting the repo info above in a 'snapshotRepository'
block instead of 'repositiry'. But it didn't work or make a difference. Also
noticed that it doesn't allow 
you to have multiple of either bolcks.

And here are the 'servers' and 'profies' sections corresponding to the
specific local repo in my settings.xml. 

 <servers>
    
    <server>      
       <username>username</username>      
       <password>pswd</password>   
       <id>my-thirdparty-lib</id>   
    </server>
  
 </servers>
 
  <profiles>
    <profile>
      <repositories>       
        <repository>
          <snapshots>
            <enabled>false</enabled>
          </snapshots>
          <id>my-thirdparty-lib</id>
          <url>http://localhost:8081/artifactory/cross-asset-lib</url>
        </repository>
      </repositories>
      <id>artifactory</id>
    </profile>
  </profiles>

 When I'm running 'mvn deploy', getting following error while uploading.
 
 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.7:deploy (default-deploy) on
project xxxPackage: Failed to deploy artifacts: Could not transfer artifact
com.xxx.pro:xxxPackage:pom:12.5-20160809.173109-1 from/to my-thirdparty-lib
(http://localhost:8081/artifactory/my-thirdparty-lib): Failed to transfer
file:
http://localhost:8081/artifactory/my-thirdparty-lib/com/xxx/pro/xxxPackage/12.5-SNAPSHOT/xxxPackage-12.5-20160809.173109-1.pom.
Return code is: 409, ReasonPhrase: Conflict. -> [Help 1]
 
 I'm using Artifactory 3.9.2.



--
View this message in context: http://forums.jfrog.org/Deploy-Artifact-to-specific-repo-other-than-libs-snapshot-release-or-libs-release-local-with-maven-dn-tp7581152.html
Sent from the Artifactory - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.