On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Matthew Inger <inger@...> wrote:
> Does anyone have any issues with changing the build script to use
> XDoclet to generate the antcontrib.properties file?
generate from what?
At first glance I'd say that making XDoclet a build requirement to
avoid adding stuff to a single properties file is a bit heavy.
Also xdoclet development has more or less come to a stop AFAICT. The
major players have left the SF project and are now working on some
kind of XDoclet 2 somewhere else (codehaus IIRC, but I can't find it
> I'm also looking into how we could use XDoclet to generate our
> html documentation, but that's a discussion for later on.
If we do that, then I'd be in favor of generating
antcontrib.properties as well.