------- Additional Comments From iaindb@... 2005-10-29 00:25 -------
For the record, I just tried (vanilla) 2.6.14_rc4, and I still get this "slowdown".
> I'm using the patch in Comment #16 which is the one that is required.
> I can't remember but I'm probably not using the patch in Comment #17 as it
> didn't do anything for the I9100.
I tried gentoo-2.6.13-gentoo-r5 with only comment #16 patch, and I got kernel
> I think there may have been an issue when suspending with processor module
> loaded and trying to resume from a kernel without the module. So build in
> processor and thermal because processor at least can't be unloaded
> successfully anyway.
I have processor and thermal built-in. I used almost exactly the same options
as with my working suspend on 2.6.12.x, so I would assume its 2.6.13 (or the
patch) thats breaking the suspend... for me!
> You'll probably want hibernate-script to unload some other problem modules
> (ndiswrapper, button, battery) and don't include any cpufreq stuff in the
> kernel config (even as modules).
I made my own script to remove some modules - all I had to do was unload
ndiswrapper, and b44 (wired network) and 2.6.12 suspended ok, but not 2.6.13...
So, what now?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.