I picked one game randomly: zen/FuegoEx-091108-8c-20091125000443.sgf

There are no comments on opponents move. Aren't you using
pondering? It could be useful to dump Fuego's pondering state
when the opponent plays.

Move 74 (W N9) is valued at 0.59 which seems too high.
This is confirmed by the significant drop to 0.47 at the
next move.

Move 170 W O17 can be considered as the losing move. It should be at J17.

Jean-loup

2009/11/27 Martin Mueller <mmueller@ualberta.ca>
More than the 9x9, the 19x19 games show a steep gradient in results by playing strength. FuegoEx wins most games against weaker programs, but loses almost all games against stronger opposition, including 37 in a row against Zen :(

CrazyStone-1102-2c22473 / 742.86
mfgo12-605-2c23685 / 2222.73
CrazyStone-10-64 24440 / 40.00
Zengg-4x4c-tst25690 / 370.00

I put games, including the search log in sgf comments, onto
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~mmueller/temp/FuegoEx-091108-8c

We are looking for insights about systematic weaknesses, especially of the game-losing kind, for specific test cases of blunders to add to the performance or regression test suites, for grossly misevaluated positions (program thinks it is winning but is losing, and vice versa), and other useful information.

Thanks

Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
fuego-devel mailing list
fuego-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fuego-devel