Ticket #15592 (assigned)
|Reported by:||auria||Owned by:||ctsai|
I am referring to this :
While the documentation clearly states which licenses are acceptable for source code, most software will also have data files - especially games. The current definition of acceptable licenses is that of the OSI terms, which require that the source code be provided - this is clearly not feasible for music, sound, 3D models or bitmap images. Licenses like Creative-Commons-BY-SA 3.0 are more appropriate to that kind of content (and are DFSG-compliant so by strict standards are also considered open).
I would therefore appreciate if the terms could be updated to clarify this ambiguity