1. Summary
  2. Files
  3. Support
  4. Report Spam
  5. Create account
  6. Log in

Why this project is needed.

From pangaia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (changed link)
(changed a link, check flow)
Line 1: Line 1:
What are the goals of a [[healthy society]]?  And are they being met best within the current system(s) of governance?  '''If the answer was yes, this project wouldn't have been conceived.'''
What are the goals of a [[healthy society]]?  And are they being met best within the current system(s) of governance?  '''If the answer was yes, this project wouldn't have been conceived.'''
-
Put simply, the project aims to explore and create new models of [[governance]] leveraging the technological efficiencies never-before available in the history of civilization, namely ubiquitous and pervasive inter-networking which has democratized masses of information and places everyone only a step away from each other, regardless of geography or the [[nation-state]].  This effort is called [[collaborative governance]].
+
Humankind has reached its Malthusian limits, there's no more territory to expand into to create value.  The only way to create new value is to ''interconnect''.  We're creating the nervous system for the Body of Man.
 +
 
 +
Put simply, the project aims to explore and create new models of [[governance]] leveraging the technological efficiencies never-before available in the history of civilization, namely ubiquitous and pervasive inter-networking which has democratized masses of information and places everyone only a step away from each other, regardless of geography or the [[nation-state]].  Collectively, this effort is called [[collaborative governance]].
The drive to create the Internet and open, collaborative platforms like [[wikipedia:wikipedia|Wikipedia]] are two such indicators of [[Meta|society's]] desire for greater ''personal'' and ''community'' participation.  These aren't the old fashioned communities of yesteryear, defined by physical geography or job location and organized around "civic pride"; these are *value* communities--people organizing themselves due to "psychic" proximity rather than geographic.  With this abundance of interest, there arises the need (as well as '''''opportunity''''') to effectively connect all these people and sift though the mounds of information that it generates.  '''Here enters the PanGaia project.'''
The drive to create the Internet and open, collaborative platforms like [[wikipedia:wikipedia|Wikipedia]] are two such indicators of [[Meta|society's]] desire for greater ''personal'' and ''community'' participation.  These aren't the old fashioned communities of yesteryear, defined by physical geography or job location and organized around "civic pride"; these are *value* communities--people organizing themselves due to "psychic" proximity rather than geographic.  With this abundance of interest, there arises the need (as well as '''''opportunity''''') to effectively connect all these people and sift though the mounds of information that it generates.  '''Here enters the PanGaia project.'''
-
The Internet and our global society are undergoing a radical experiment, evolving in parallel across [[Related projects|many different internet locations]].  Each is fundamentally trying to answer the same question:  How can one build an active community of upwards of a million users '''''without''''' centralized control?  The question is being asked both politically and practically:  It's simply not feasible to manually process and sift through everything using "old media" paradigms and methodologies, ''nor is it desirable''.  In an era where everyone can be their own publisher, one must give serious thought of how to give voice to all without drowning in chaos or capitulating to old-power techniques (see [[FOSS]] and the comparison to economic protectionism).
+
The Internet and our global society are undergoing a radical experiment, evolving in parallel across many different internet locations.  Each is fundamentally trying to answer the same question:  How can one build an active community of upwards of a million users '''''without''''' centralized control?  The question is being asked both politically and practically:  It's simply not feasible to manually process and sift through everything using "old media" paradigms and methodologies, ''nor is it desirable''.  In an era where everyone can be their own publisher, one must give serious thought of how to give voice to all without drowning in chaos or capitulating to old-power techniques -- which is why this is a [[FOSS| Free Software project]].
-
One thing ''is'' clear:  Our market system and democracy fall short of their [[declaration of independence|ideals]] due to exploitation of information imbalances (see also [[Trust]]).  Like any form of protectionism, this inefficiency hurts everyone--[[wikipedia:enlightened_self_interest|even, ultimately, the ones at the "top"]].  
+
In any case, one thing ''is'' clear:  Our market system and democracy fall short of their [[declaration of independence|ideals]] due to exploitation of information imbalances (see also [[Trust]]).  Like any form of protectionism, this inefficiency hurts everyone--[[wikipedia:enlightened_self_interest|even, ultimately, the ones at the "top"]].  
-
Finding ways to establish true [[user-ranking|merit]], in real time, and the means in which to cultivate it and allocate decision-making authority are inherent in the notion of PanGaia as well as making an efficient marketplace and [[larger desires of society|thriving society]].
+
Finding ways to establish true [[user-ranking|merit]], in real time, and the means in which to cultivate it and allocate decision-making authority are inherent in the notion of PanGaia as well as making an efficient marketplace and [[new economy|thriving society]].
Need more pep talk?  Check the [[Talk:Why this project is needed.|discussion]] tab.
Need more pep talk?  Check the [[Talk:Why this project is needed.|discussion]] tab.

Revision as of 04:59, 29 September 2010

What are the goals of a healthy society? And are they being met best within the current system(s) of governance? If the answer was yes, this project wouldn't have been conceived.

Humankind has reached its Malthusian limits, there's no more territory to expand into to create value. The only way to create new value is to interconnect. We're creating the nervous system for the Body of Man.

Put simply, the project aims to explore and create new models of governance leveraging the technological efficiencies never-before available in the history of civilization, namely ubiquitous and pervasive inter-networking which has democratized masses of information and places everyone only a step away from each other, regardless of geography or the nation-state. Collectively, this effort is called collaborative governance.

The drive to create the Internet and open, collaborative platforms like Wikipedia are two such indicators of society's desire for greater personal and community participation. These aren't the old fashioned communities of yesteryear, defined by physical geography or job location and organized around "civic pride"; these are *value* communities--people organizing themselves due to "psychic" proximity rather than geographic. With this abundance of interest, there arises the need (as well as opportunity) to effectively connect all these people and sift though the mounds of information that it generates. Here enters the PanGaia project.

The Internet and our global society are undergoing a radical experiment, evolving in parallel across many different internet locations. Each is fundamentally trying to answer the same question: How can one build an active community of upwards of a million users without centralized control? The question is being asked both politically and practically: It's simply not feasible to manually process and sift through everything using "old media" paradigms and methodologies, nor is it desirable. In an era where everyone can be their own publisher, one must give serious thought of how to give voice to all without drowning in chaos or capitulating to old-power techniques -- which is why this is a Free Software project.

In any case, one thing is clear: Our market system and democracy fall short of their ideals due to exploitation of information imbalances (see also Trust). Like any form of protectionism, this inefficiency hurts everyone--even, ultimately, the ones at the "top".

Finding ways to establish true merit, in real time, and the means in which to cultivate it and allocate decision-making authority are inherent in the notion of PanGaia as well as making an efficient marketplace and thriving society.

Need more pep talk? Check the discussion tab.

Personal tools