The SF Trac offering doesn't provide a way for the Trac admin to install any of the plethora of Trac plugins. This severely hobbles the Trac offering in many instanced.
Is there any reason not to support the svn+ssh protocol? It is more secure than a username/password pair, which Subversion caches by default on the machine.
In a SVN commit message to a SourceForge.net subversion repo when you make a comment such as:
"fixes #89"
the ticket references by "fixes" (89 in this case) in the SourceForge Trac HostedApp instance should automatically be closed. Currently it doesn't (so far you have to go in trac and close it manually).
Written by firebrand_kh the 9 May 09 at 00:03.
New
We are actually unable to use the hosted apps offering, because we are already running a phpBB forum on our own server, but for management reasons we want to change it to use the SF.net hosted app, but we can't import the data from the running app to the hosted app.
I would like to begin using Trac to manage my Bugs and Feature Request tickets, replacing the existing Tracker system. I would like to automatically transfer over my open tickets. as well as the historical record of all my closed tickets, from Tracker to Trac.
I have just uploaded my company project in Sourceforge.net along with the whole Subversion repository. We use to manage the development process with TRAC, so I've requested and enabled it.
In trac we create and manage tickets: this is an activity for our project and we would like that it contributes to sourceforge.net statistics computation.
I think that the same policy should be applied to other hosted apps: wordpress blog posts or ideatorrent "ideas in development" or "implemented ideas", but this is not needed for us now.
I came across it completely accidentally once, and then had a really hard time trying to find it again. It's great that you put this app up, but if it's hard to find, its usefulness is limited. It should be linked to from some high-profile page...
Someone gave an anonymous "thumbs down" to one of my projects, without even bothering to say what it was they didn't like! I worked hard for many weeks on this project, and I offer it for free, with free support. I am really upset and discouraged by this thumbs down. I feel like I have been kicked in the teeth. Why do I bother to offer my software and my time for free? What kind of stupid crazy idiot am I for doing this? It really made me think. I should make better use of my time. I have already dropped my plans to publish one new project and upgrade another.
Compare this with giving bad feedback on eBay. First, eBay encourages users to have exhaustive dialog to resolve a dispute before leaving bad feedback as an absolute last resort. The system warns you that leaving bad feedback is extremely serious and should not be undertaken lightly. And of course, you cannot do so anonymously. And of course eBay is about products that are being bought and sold, so in some cases bad feedback can be justified.
Here on SourceForge, developers work hard and give their time and expertise for free. I don't think that "thumbs down" is even remotely appropriate in this environment. Thumbs up is fine, but thumbs down is wrong here and should be removed. If users don't like something in a project, they should engage in constructive dialog with the author, or better still, offer to help. Just giving a thumbs down is rude and ignorant and we should not encourage this kind of behaviour here.
I have submitted few IdeaTorrent articles, and for some that were submitted by others I made a comment. I need to bookmark into my browser each IdeaTorrent article I made or contributed to. This is not so comfortable.
Reviewboard is a very nice codereview system that can talk to a variaty of SCM systems.
It also has a very nice cli tool to post new reviewrequests or updates directly from your sourcetree.
Written by happy-slapin the 20 May 09 at 12:32.
New
Bugzilla ( http://www.bugzilla.org ) is powerful and popular, largely deployed bug tracking system with proper implementation of bug life cycle and lots of fancy things. It is often can't be replaced by things like Mantis (not mentioning Trac's tocket system because it is even less powered). Bugzilla has its own niche and a lot of people are used to it.
Our project intends to use the sourceforge hosted apps phpBB offering because maintaining an own phpBB with all the limitations of the web servers is a bit annoying. However, we now _do_ have the data from the old forum around, so it would be nice if one could somehow migrate it.
The downside here is of course that it takes some time to implement it, and by the time it is implemented, many (such as us now) may have switched without migrating the data, so that this feature is slightly obsolete.
The previous SF user interface showed a link to the list of all project members on the project summary page. This is only fair, as they are the folks who do the actual work.
The new SF user interface, however, shows only a list of the administrators of a project, on the project summary page, and on the developer page.
The ParserFunctions extension is what you need to add more complex templates to MediaWiki. It allows (below other things) to check whether parameters of templates are defined or not.
The specific example I have is a navigation template which should take as parameters in correct order the sites between the Wiki main page and the current site.
Example:
Navigation|Manual
would give me a template containing the following Text (including the respective links):
ShareazaWiki / Manual / *titleofthecurrentpage*
Navigation|Manual|Advanced
would become:
ShareazaWiki / Manual / Advanced / *titleofthecurrentpage*